top of page

Inorganic vs Organic

COAGULANT

Inorganic Coagulant

jartest.JPG

Inorganic coagulant is a type of chemical used in water treatment to remove impurities, such as dirt, sediment, and organic matter. It works by destabilizing the particles in the water, causing them to clump together and settle to the bottom or be removed through filtration.

There are several types of inorganic coagulants commonly used in water treatment, including aluminum sulfate, ferric chloride, and polyaluminum chloride. Each type of coagulant has its own advantages and disadvantages depending on the water condition and treatment goals.

Here are some common types of inorganic coagulants:

Alumunium Sulfate
Al2(SO4)3

Advantages

  • Effective in removing dissolved organic matter and turbidity.

  • Affordable and widely available.

Disadvantages

  • May cause sludge build-up over time.

  • pH dependent; may require pH adjustment before use.

  • High dosage requirements may increase the total dissolved solids (TDS) level of the treated water.

Ferrous Sulfate
FeSO4

Advantages

  • Effective in removing hydrogen sulfide and organic matter.

  • Low cost.

Disadvantages

  • May cause sludge build-up over time.

  • pH dependent; may require pH adjustment before use.

Ferric Chloride
FeCl3

Advantages

  • Effective in removing heavy metals, phosphorus, and suspended solids.

  • Can handle a wide range of pH levels.

Disadvantages

  • Expensive compared to other coagulants.

  • May cause odor and color issues in the treated water.

Calcium Oxide
CaO

Advantages

  • Effective in removing turbidity and heavy metals.

  • Low cost

Disadvantages

  • Requires slaking before use.

  • pH dependent; may require pH adjustment before use.

  • May cause scaling in the treatment equipment.

Poly Alumunium Chloride
AlnCl(3n-m)(OH)m

Advantages

  • More stable than aluminum sulfate and ferric chloride.

  • Lower dosage requirement.

Disadvantages

  • Expensive compared to aluminum sulfate.

  • May cause sludge build-up over time.

Calcium Hydroxide
Ca(OH)2

Advantages

  • Effective in removing turbidity, heavy metals, and hardness.

  • Lower dosage requirement than calcium oxide.

Disadvantages

  • Requires slaking before use.

  • pH dependent; may require pH adjustment before use.

  • May cause scaling in the treatment equipment.

Organic Coagulant

Organic coagulant is a type of chemical used in water treatment that contains carbon-based compounds. It works by adsorbing or neutralizing charged particles in the water, causing them to clump together and settle to the bottom or be removed through filtration.

DSCN0418.JPG

Sodium Aluminate
NaAlO2

Advantages

  • Effective in removing color and turbidity.

  • Lower dosage requirement.

Zinc Sulfate
ZnSO4

Advantages

  • Effective in removing phosphorus and suspended solids.

  • Low cost.

Disadvantages

  • May cause sludge build-up over time.

  • pH dependent; may require pH adjustment before use.

Magnesium Sulfate
MgSO4

Advantages

  • Effective in removing hardness and alkalinity.

  • Low cost.

Disadvantages

  • May cause sludge build-up over time.

  • pH dependent; may require pH adjustment before use.

Polymeric Alumunium PAX
Aln(OH)mCl(3n-m)

Advantages

  • More stable than other coagulants.

  • Lower dosage requirement.

Disadvantages

  • Expensive compared to aluminum sulfate.

  • May cause sludge build-up over time.

Disadvantages

  • Expensive compared to other coagulants.

  • May cause sludge build-up over time.

PolyDADMAC
(C8H16NCl)n

Advantages

  • Effective in removing turbidity and color.

  • Low dosage requirement.

Disadvantages

  • Expensive compared to inorganic coagulants.

  • May cause sludge build-up over time.

  • Biodegradability concerns.

Chitosan
(C6H11NO4)n

Advantages

  • Biodegradable and eco-friendly.

  • Effective in removing heavy metals and organic matter.

Disadvantages

  • Expensive compared to inorganic coagulants.

  • May cause sludge build-up over time.

  • pH dependent; may require pH adjustment.

Polyamine
(C5H14N)n

Advantages

  • Effective in removing turbidity and color.

  • Low dosage requirement.

Disadvantages

  • Expensive compared to inorganic coagulants.

  • May cause sludge build-up over time.

  • Biodegradability concerns.

Tannin-based
Varies based on source material

Advantages

  • Natural and eco-friendly.

  • Effective in removing color and some organic matter.

Polyacrylamide
(C3H5NO)n

Advantages

  • Effective in removing suspended solids, turbidity, and some organic matter.

  • Lower dosage requirement.

Disadvantages

  • May increase the total dissolved solids (TDS) level of the treated water.

  • Biodegradability concerns.

Customized product

Based on water characteristics and its environment

when will we use inorganic or organic coagulant?

in what situation?

The choice of using inorganic or organic coagulants depends on several factors, including the nature and characteristics of the water to be treated, the specific contaminants to be removed, the required water quality standards, and the  cost-effectiveness of the coagulation process.

 

Here are some general guidelines:

  • Inorganic coagulants such as aluminum sulfate (alum), ferric chloride, and polyaluminum chloride (PAC) are commonly used for treating surface water and groundwater sources containing high levels of turbidity, suspended solids, and organic matter. They are effective in removing these contaminants and are relatively inexpensive compared to organic coagulants.

  • Organic coagulants such as polyDADMAC, polyamine, polyacrylamide, chitosan, and tannin-based coagulants are typically used in situations where the treated water must meet stringent water quality standards or where the presence of organic contaminants is a concern. They are effective in removing color, organic matter, and some heavy metals. However, they are generally more expensive than inorganic coagulants and may require higher dosages to achieve the desired treatment effect.

 

In summary, the choice of coagulant depends on the specific water treatment needs and the desired water quality standards.

bottom of page